Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Tue Apr 30, 2024 3:41 am

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 8:45 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:03 pm
Posts: 9069
Location: IRWIN PA
Car Model:
Does it rev less / like to rev less with a 198 crank vs the 170 crank?

Greg

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/hyperpack
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 12:47 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 11:08 am
Posts: 16515
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Car Model:
Well, more power per cylinder for 198 crank might give higher revving, but shorter stroke for 170 crank and larger head flow per cylinder might favor higher revving. Also, the shorter the stroke, the less load on rods, pistons, and bearings at a given RPM. I see no reason you could not rev 7000 with either crank given that a 225 will rev 6000 reliably. Valvetrain might be another issue...

Lou

_________________
Home of Slant6-powered fun machines


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:23 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & SL6 Racer

Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:57 pm
Posts: 8345
Location: Waynesboro, Pa.
Car Model: 65 Valiant 2Dr Post
The question is even if the 210 will turn 7000 rpm will the head support that amount of air?

_________________
2 Mopars come with Spark plug tubes. One is a world class, racing machine. The other is a 426 CI. boat anchor!
Image
12.70 @ 104.6
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 5:40 pm 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:03 pm
Posts: 9069
Location: IRWIN PA
Car Model:
Less cubes ....does it require less runner cfm?

I thinks we will find out.

I bet if you get a skookum 1.75- 1.8/ 1.50 valve head with good work done to it, it could.

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/hyperpack
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 6:12 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 11:08 am
Posts: 16515
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Car Model:
Yes, fewer cubes will require less head CFM at a given RPM.

Lou

_________________
Home of Slant6-powered fun machines


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 6:35 pm 
Offline
SL6 Racer & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 12:06 pm
Posts: 8464
Location: Silver Springs, Fl.
Car Model:
And if you need more oxygen, there is always this, "N2O". The 170 engine that was in my Cuda went 7,000 rpm a few times. But I would suggest using a low mount DS alternator. That long belt with a pass side alt, doesn't like staying on at that rpm.

_________________
Charrlie_S
65 Valiant 100 2dr post 170 turbo
66 Valiant Signet 225 nitrous
64 Valiant Signet
64 Valiant 4dr 170


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 10:17 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:27 pm
Posts: 14165
Location: Park Forest, Illinoisy
Car Model: 68 Valiant
The 225 in my car goes 7000 in the water regularly. I used to shift on track at 7000, but it makes no power over 6300.

_________________
Official Cookie and Mater Tormentor.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2022 4:07 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:03 pm
Posts: 9069
Location: IRWIN PA
Car Model:
slantzilla wrote:
The 225 in my car goes 7000 in the water regularly. I used to shift on track at 7000, but it makes no power over 6300.



That is a Jeffery built engine and Head correct?

It's probably the exception rather than the rule.

:D :D :shock:

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/hyperpack
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2022 6:47 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:27 pm
Posts: 14165
Location: Park Forest, Illinoisy
Car Model: 68 Valiant
Mike gives me hell every time I tell him that. :mrgreen:

Personally I try to stay away from even less cubes than a 225. When you're already handicapping yourself with a small motor why make it worse with less power band?

_________________
Official Cookie and Mater Tormentor.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2022 9:11 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:03 pm
Posts: 9069
Location: IRWIN PA
Car Model:
I bet that narrow power band is fun on the street when built properly.

For all out drag racing.... then booost or bottles may be needed.

it's all relative.

:shock:

Greg

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/hyperpack
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 3:32 pm 
Offline
Guru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 11:22 am
Posts: 3740
Location: Sonoma, Calif.
Car Model: Many Darts and a Dacuda
Dart270 wrote:
About 20 lbs less weight (block) and smaller/lower profile engine. Not big deals, but why not? Why would anyone build a 170 instead of a 225? :P :wink: Just for the heck of it...
Lou


I built a couple of "low block" 210 Slants mostly just to see if it could be done and how they worked...
And they "work" like a bored-out 198, less a little weight.

As already noted, no big power gain or magic out of this combo but if I were to stick a SL6 into a little sports car, with a low hood line, I would likely use a low block 210.

Truth is, many of the experimental hybrid SL6 engines I built over the years were done to satisfy my curiosity and "because I can" attitude... instead of trying to make the most horsepower out of an SL6.
DD


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited