Slant Six Forum,  Forum Index
Slant Six Forum,  Forum Index
Slant Six Forum,  Forum Index
Home Slant Six Forum,  Forum Index Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search

Click here to make a New Year's donation to the Slant Six Forum!

Turbo for tq and mpg increase in a truck
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Slant Six Forum, Forum Index -> Boost & Nitrous
Select message display options:             View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
raPoM
Turbo Slant 6


Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 961
Location: Round Rock Tx

Post subject: Turbo for tq and mpg increase in a truck (Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:30 pm) Reply with quote

This is just a "what if" kind of discussion. I dont have any money to do this,but I have had this idea for a while.I thought some of you might like to make a discussion out of it.

I daily drive an 87 D100 with a hydro 225,833 od,and 8 1/4 with a 3.55 open. It runs great,the slant/4 speed combo is about perfect for a daily driver I think. Im getting about 15-16 mpg in town,and about 18-19 if I do all highway. Not too shabby I think,and this is with the stock lean burn carb/ignition,and old pre-cat and cat that im sure could stand to be replaced.My only real complaint is that it is about as gutless as roadkill. I dont hot rod it around at all, I dont drive over 65-70 mph on the highway,and I dont rev it above 3800rpm.I would, however, like some passing power on the highway.

Here is my "idea": I have been thinking about finding a small turbo in the junkyard,and doing a cheap turbo build for my truck with three goals. 1. increase mpg,2. increase low end torque,and 3. increase passing power on the highway.

My plan would include a small turbo ie: 2.5 dodge,2.3 ford/mazda etc... Convert a holley 1920 for blowthrough,and run an intercooler. Low boost like 5-8lbs on my stock motor. Stock cam,block,head etc...

I would basically treat it like a diesel,only rev it up to about 3500,and cruise it at 1800-2000 rpm. I think I might be able to pick up a few mpg,and an appreciable amount of low end tq/passing power.

What do you think?


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlantSixDan
Board Sponsor & Contributor


Joined: 31 Oct 2002
Posts: 21883
Location: North America

Post subject: (Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:25 pm) Reply with quote

I can think of a fair list of reasons why this would probably not give you a result like you're hoping for. D'you really want me to list 'em out?



_________________
一期一会

By birth & parentage: US citizen, 2nd class
By choice: Canadian citizen, 1st class

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
raPoM
Turbo Slant 6


Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 961
Location: Round Rock Tx

Post subject: (Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:35 pm) Reply with quote

Sure,if you are so inclined. I am open to all opinions. This is only a what if situation anyway,so its just "talk" at this point.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlantSixDan
Board Sponsor & Contributor


Joined: 31 Oct 2002
Posts: 21883
Location: North America

Post subject: (Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:54 pm) Reply with quote

[post deleted by author]



_________________
一期一会

By birth & parentage: US citizen, 2nd class
By choice: Canadian citizen, 1st class



Last edited by SlantSixDan on Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
raPoM
Turbo Slant 6


Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 961
Location: Round Rock Tx

Post subject: (Sat Mar 03, 2012 6:19 pm) Reply with quote

Thank you for your insight.

Blow through with a 1bbl has be done successfully before,and from my research mpg stayed the same,or saw a slight improvement,and that was from users who added the turbo for performance,not economy.

I understand what you are saying about having to jet up,and losing out on economy,that was a concern of mine as well.

As far as tuning the blow through set up,it shouldnt be too hard with a wideband 02 installed,and I like to tinker.However I have no desire to go with any form of fuel injection.

The truck is also cat delete,and I do not have to pass any form of emissions testing, so no worries there.

As far as not getting really good mpg,again,I agree with you there. I feel that the current mpg I am getting now is down right respectable for what it is.

Even if I gained 1-2 mpg city/highway I would be happy. Even without a gain in economy,if the low end tq was improved enough for me to use 4th above 60 mph,without a loss in mpg,again I would be very happy.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlantSixDan
Board Sponsor & Contributor


Joined: 31 Oct 2002
Posts: 21883
Location: North America

Post subject: (Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:16 pm) Reply with quote

[post deleted by author]



_________________
一期一会

By birth & parentage: US citizen, 2nd class
By choice: Canadian citizen, 1st class



Last edited by SlantSixDan on Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
raPoM
Turbo Slant 6


Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 961
Location: Round Rock Tx

Post subject: (Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:43 pm) Reply with quote

SlantSixDan wrote:
raPoM wrote:
Blow through with a 1bbl has be done successfully before


So has breaker point ignition.


Yep,when set up right points work well. I have known a few guys who have run points in their FI cars with no problems.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlantSixDan
Board Sponsor & Contributor


Joined: 31 Oct 2002
Posts: 21883
Location: North America

Post subject: (Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:20 pm) Reply with quote

[post deleted by author]



_________________
一期一会

By birth & parentage: US citizen, 2nd class
By choice: Canadian citizen, 1st class



Last edited by SlantSixDan on Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
raPoM
Turbo Slant 6


Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 961
Location: Round Rock Tx

Post subject: (Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:40 pm) Reply with quote

I understand that you do not like the thought of a blow through set up with a 1bbl carb,but that is what this thread is about. Its not about the best option,or the worst option,or how breaker points suck.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kesteb
Board Sponsor


Joined: 06 Nov 2002
Posts: 1511
Location: Everett, WA

Post subject: (Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:18 pm) Reply with quote

There is information on how to do a blow thru with a 1v carb is on the Ford Six board. http://fordsix.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=31477


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raPoM
Turbo Slant 6


Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 961
Location: Round Rock Tx

Post subject: (Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:36 pm) Reply with quote

kesteb wrote:
There is information on how to do a blow thru with a 1v carb is on the Ford Six board. http://fordsix.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=31477


Thank you sir Very Happy Bookmarked.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dart270
Board Sponsor & Moderator


Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 9602
Location: Blacksburg, VA

Post subject: (Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:43 am) Reply with quote

My 2 cents:

I would put on a rather big turbo, and a BBD or even bigger carb. On my car, the MPG did not change at all with the big T4 turbo set up, IF I keep my foot out of it and it makes little or no boost.

Heck, I would try a BBD with nothing else first, and you'll get more power and likely better economy.

Lou



_________________
Return of the 64 Dart. Hang on...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raPoM
Turbo Slant 6


Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 961
Location: Round Rock Tx

Post subject: (Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:17 pm) Reply with quote

Lou-

I understand your logic,but the whole idea behind this would be "cheap". I dont have a 2bbl intake or BBD. I do have a 1bbl intake and a spare 1920.
I cant find any "big" turbos in the JY that arent too big(think turbo diesel).

For the price of buying a 2bbl intake,and a BBD+rebuild kit(if I can find a bbd without leaking throttle shafts...)and aircleaner, I could get the turbo/intercooler/rebuild-retrofit parts to set the 1920 up for boost/ and have a pipe welded up to mate the turbo to the stock exhaust. The only real extra expense over the 2bbl set up would be a wideband O2.Plus the whole turbo experiment would be new and interesting compared to the 2bbl swap(been there done that)

Again these are all just thoughts,as I dont have any money to spend at the moment. Thanks everyone for your input! Very Happy


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rug_Trucker
Supercharged


Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2584
Location: Pertneer Nashville TN

Post subject: (Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:13 am) Reply with quote

Allpar.com a few years ago had a "how to" budget turbo slant article just like you want. IIRC $300?



_________________
'72 Duster 198 stock cam, 3:23's Hookers

'74Fart Dart Razz

'79 Maxivan 360 Offy Qjet Comp RV cam
93 D350 160HP Cummins Auto Sad Dually Clubcab
93 Corolla
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raPoM
Turbo Slant 6


Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 961
Location: Round Rock Tx

Post subject: (Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:03 am) Reply with quote

I will have to look it up,but I think I have seen it before. I can get all the turbo stuff at the JY for 120.00,and then I need a rebuild kit and odds and ends for the 1920 to get it ready for boost,and then a wideband O2 which I can get for 150.00 so around 300.00 sounds about right! Very Happy


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Select message display options:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Slant Six Forum, Forum Index -> Boost & Nitrous All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Go To Slant Six Forum Home

Mopar Ring Member Site
Mopar Ring Member Site



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Theme created by Vjacheslav Trushkin, modified by Chuck Rivers