| Slant Six Forum https://www.slantsix.org/forum/ |
|
| Apparently not the FAQ https://www.slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=42374 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | ceej [ Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Now you two play nice, or I'll come over there and..and.. oh heck. I got nuthin'. CJ |
|
| Author: | slantzilla [ Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Please tell me how no2 is boost too? It's NOT! Quote: The gasket does not change how a stock head flows or how the stock bearings, pistons, rings performed....etc The engine still ran fine with the stock head gasket...it just pushed water out under boost. And, If I recall, it still went 12's all "stock" and 11's with a new head gasket and o-rings.
It DOES change the engines ability to handle boost though. You have stated yourself that the "stock" engine could not handle large doses of boost w/o taking out the head gasket.Stock head gaskets don't last long in nitrous motors either though. |
|
| Author: | turbo66valiant [ Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Wouldnt a relatively stock slant be able to run decent times like for example a 189hp version of ryans car with no turbo since it has a 4000stall and what not?
I would like to see a 189 rwhp motor in my car. I'm guessing crank hp being around 230-235. This is a fairly stout NA motor. In mine it is either all in or all out. Also, no boost = no stall. What I was trying to get at before was I would like to see a nitrous fed motor be as tame as mine but on the bottle put out the same. Is it possible? Also, my stock head gasket handled 27 psi when the AF was within reason. I would only have an issue with weather change or me trying something new. Dennis, are you the quickest nitrous feed Slant? Later
Kev |
|
| Author: | 1974duster kev [ Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh I was just saying it out of curiosity, now that i think about it that would be a stout na motor cuz my na motor has a pretty big cam 10;1 compression and the good bits and its probably not much more than 200horse, just a guess. Sounds like theres a nitrous slash turbo fued brewing that just leads to good ol fashion competition |
|
| Author: | Shaker223 [ Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Quote: Please tell me how no2 is boost too? It's NOT! Quote: The gasket does not change how a stock head flows or how the stock bearings, pistons, rings performed....etc The engine still ran fine with the stock head gasket...it just pushed water out under boost. And, If I recall, it still went 12's all "stock" and 11's with a new head gasket and o-rings.
It DOES change the engines ability to handle boost though. You have stated yourself that the "stock" engine could not handle large doses of boost w/o taking out the head gasket.Stock head gaskets don't last long in nitrous motors either though. The original headgasket never failed and I never said boost would take out the gasket. The gasket was actually fine but the bolts were the culprit. It still went 12's. Ok, so I changed the gasket and actually made the engine "less than stock" because the compression ratio was reduced below the factory level due to a twice as thick head gasket. In the final analysis, with a "less than stock" engine, the car went faster piggie with less cam, less head, less convertor, less gear, less tire, more weight by almost 8mph and .23 seconds. |
|
| Author: | emsvitil [ Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote:
First off, No2 is an oxidizer, it in no way adds PSI to the engine like a turbo and supercharger.
But it boosts the amount of O2 in the combustion chamber.......... So combustion pressure goes up like it does with a turbo or supercharger. The greater combustion pressure is what blows out the headgaskets. |
|
| Author: | turbo66valiant [ Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Sounds like theres a nitrous slash turbo fued brewing that just leads to good ol fashion competition |
|
| Author: | slantzilla [ Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: In the final analysis, with a "less than stock" engine, the car went faster piggie with less cam, less head, less convertor, less gear, less tire, more weight by almost 8mph and .23 seconds. Really though, who needs a cam, headwork, converter, etc, when you have a turbo, intercooler, and alcohol injection? potato, potahto. If you look back, I have stated many times that a turbo IS the way to go for big power that does not kill parts like nitrous does. I guess no one paid any attention to that. I don't even have a nitrous combination at this time simply because boost does not make a good bracket car. I had the fastest Slant street car in the country for a long time, and all it did was cost me money. By the way, if force feeding oxygen to a motor isn't boost, what is it? Peace, out. |
|
| Author: | Shaker223 [ Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
W=Whatever. Live in your make belive world. |
|
| Author: | turboram [ Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have one thats fed with a turbo AND nitrous so where does that put me......... |
|
| Author: | Charrlie_S [ Fri Oct 29, 2010 6:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: I have one thats fed with a turbo AND nitrous so where does that put me.........
Quote: the crank broke and split my trans !! I found a main bolt in the road on my walk back home.Well at least I didn't cause a oil down. I'll post pictures of the carnage in a little bit when my truck gets towed home
Walking home ![]() |
|
| Author: | wvenable [ Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Man this new section IS good! |
|
| Author: | turboram [ Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
LMAO |
|
| Author: | Charrlie_S [ Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: LMAO
I'm glad to see you took it as I meant it. After I posted, I was thinking you might take it as a "put down", and not as a smart a$$ remark. I was not able to get back here before now.
|
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC-08:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|