| Slant Six Forum https://www.slantsix.org/forum/ |
|
| Hey cool it's got a Sure Grip https://www.slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22771 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Jopapa [ Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Hey cool it's got a Sure Grip |
Changed the oil in my diff today and discovered that it has a Sure Grip! Also found out from the (nearly kaput) tag that it's sportin' a 3.55 gear ratio. Very, very cool. I was planning to put this ratio in at some point if it had a lower gear, but I'll leave that right where it is. Only complaint was that I didn't pick up any limited slip additive while I was out earlier. Fortunately the shop had some on hand. Yay I have a Sure Grip |
|
| Author: | SlantSixDan [ Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
3.55 Suregrip? And this car has...what transmission? |
|
| Author: | Jopapa [ Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: 3.55 Suregrip? And this car has...what transmission?
A 904 I would assume. 3-speed auto, and I wouldn't expect to see a 727 come stock behind a slant, even as a factory option.The car WAS originally bought from Plymouth by the WA State Department of Ecology, so maybe the rear was a special order? |
|
| Author: | SlantSixDan [ Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cannot imagine why a government agency would order a ratio that would make the car thoroughly unpleasant and highly uneconomical at speed above about 45 mph. I think probably a previous owner swapped in this rear axle you've found. 3.23s or 2.93s would be much more appropriate for all-around use on the street. |
|
| Author: | Jopapa [ Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Cannot imagine why a government agency would order a ratio that would make the car thoroughly unpleasant and highly uneconomical at speed above about 45 mph. I think probably a previous owner swapped in this rear axle you've found.
That'd make sense. It looked to be in pretty good shape though, so either way, at least now I don't have to do the work myself of swapping out the gears for the 833OD. So at least there was some good news for me today.
3.23s or 2.93s would be much more appropriate for all-around use on the street. |
|
| Author: | slantvaliant [ Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Cannot imagine why a government agency ...
... government agency ...I think we found the problem! I think Dan's right about a past swap, but governments do buy some interesting hardware now and then. Remember the EPA's Superbird ? |
|
| Author: | Charrlie_S [ Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Cannot imagine why a government agency would order a ratio that would make the car thoroughly unpleasant and highly uneconomical at speed above about 45 mph. I think probably a previous owner swapped in this rear axle you've found.
The fender tag would reveal this, wouldn't it?
3.23s or 2.93s would be much more appropriate for all-around use on the street. |
|
| Author: | Jopapa [ Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Quote: Cannot imagine why a government agency would order a ratio that would make the car thoroughly unpleasant and highly uneconomical at speed above about 45 mph. I think probably a previous owner swapped in this rear axle you've found.
The fender tag would reveal this, wouldn't it?3.23s or 2.93s would be much more appropriate for all-around use on the street. |
|
| Author: | DionR [ Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Looks under the seats for the Build Sheet, too. Alway cool to find that, plus it might confirm the gears if the data plate wont. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-08:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|