Slant Six Forum
https://www.slantsix.org/forum/

K-members and mounts.
https://www.slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2641
Page 1 of 1

Author:  DART"68&quot [ Tue Sep 04, 2001 9:40 pm ]
Post subject:  K-members and mounts.

Which are better and why? The older style with the biscuit mounts or the newer style with the spool mounts.

drucker@sbcglobal.net

Author:  Doctor Dodge (Doug Dutra) [ Tue Sep 04, 2001 11:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: K-members and mounts.

Quote:
: Which are better and why? The older style with
: the biscuit mounts or the newer style with
: the spool mounts.


Spool type, hands down, no brainer.
Spool type mounts last longer, they will contain the engine even when worn-out or broken, they can be stiffened by filling the voids in the rubber and most of all, these make engine "drop-ins" a snap.

If you have a 67 or later A-Body and do lots of engine swaps or if you are about to do front end work, swap-over the K-frame to the spool type while you are in there.
DD

Author:  DART"68&quot [ Wed Sep 05, 2001 2:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: K-members and mounts.

Quote:
: Spool type, hands down, no brainer.
: Spool type mounts last longer, they will
: contain the engine even when worn-out or
: broken, they can be stiffened by filling the
: voids in the rubber and most of all, these
: make engine "drop-ins" a snap.
:
: If you have a 67 or later A-Body and do lots of
: engine swaps or if you are about to do front
: end work, swap-over the K-frame to the spool
: type while you are in there.
: DD


Okay, thanks for the info. But will I have to use the idler arm and associated steering linkage from the donor vehicle? Thanks again for sharing your knowledge.

drucker@sbcglobal.net

Author:  Doctor Dodge (Doug Dutra) [ Wed Sep 05, 2001 9:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: K-members, mounts & idler arms.

Quote:
: Okay, thanks for the info. But will I have to
: use the idler arm and associated steering
: linkage from the donor vehicle? Thanks again
: for sharing your knowledge.


The spool K's use the "through bolt" type idler arm. (68-76) there are a few different center links tat all swap in, I used the 68-72 type because it has the deepest "U" and gets me the most oil pan clearance.
DD

Author:  Red [ Wed Sep 05, 2001 9:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: K-members and mounts.

Quote:
: Spool type, hands down, no brainer.
: Spool type mounts last longer, they will
: contain the engine even when worn-out or
: broken, they can be stiffened by filling the
: voids in the rubber and most of all, these
: make engine "drop-ins" a snap.
:
: If you have a 67 or later A-Body and do lots of
: engine swaps or if you are about to do front
: end work, swap-over the K-frame to the spool
: type while you are in there.
: DD


Here's another, related question: does anybody refurbish these (a-la Damper Dudes)? I was shopping for new spool types awhile ago and even the ones bearing the names of supposedly-reputable American companies were "hecho en Mejico" and very poorly made.
I found one Borg Warner (@ an independent auto parts store) which had obviously been on the shelf for years---the difference in quality was striking. Any American companies still making good ones? Thanks.

---Red

Torr66@aol.com

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC-07:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/