Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Tue Apr 21, 2026 11:52 pm

All times are UTC-07:00




Forum locked  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: /6 oversized valves
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2001 2:08 pm 
Hello all, I been searching through the "search" and looking at topics about oversized valves, The information is good but not direct to what I exactly need to tell my machinist.

I was leaning toward the buick 3.8 valves. If I were to choose the buick valves, what should be told to the machinist.The Buick valves are 1.71 and the lenth is 4.727 and the /6 is 4.78 in lenth,which makes the buick valves .053 shorter.What needs to be done to correct, or would this "drop in".Also the exhaust valves are 1.487 and 4.727 in lenth also, and the exh. on a slant six is 4.802, so were looking at .057 difference on exhaust. Hes a very knowledgable guy (over 30 years) and understands exactly what im doing and has done it before, but im the kind of person that I need to make it clear to him, so theres no mix up.

Using the chevy valves(1.72 1.50),wouldnt there be problems because of the lenth?

Using the ford valves (what are the sizes?)is there a problem with the lenth?

I would just like to put the least amount of machine work time into the valves, the easiest one that works for a oversized valved head. I dont want to get creative, just get something that works. Thank You

Do0dlebug19@aol.com


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: /6 oversized valves
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2001 3:31 pm 
I used Ford small block valves, Manley, from PAW, Part #'s S-1670 I(1.78) and A-1669 E(1.453). These valves have 11/32" stems & are slightly longer than stock 6 valves. My machine shop cut the length of the new Ford valves (they have plenty of material above the lock groove) to match the original 6 valve length, and using Comp Cam's springs, retainers, and locks we were right on for spring height without shims and rocker arm contact pattern on the top of the stem. Also, the rockers do not come within 0.080" of the retainer at full lift (0.532" E). Rocker arm contact with the stem is directly related to valve length, and unlike a stud mount rocker, the only good way to change the contact point of the rocker to the valve stem is to adjust the valve length. We expect to rev this combination to 6000-6200 rpm with good reliability.


sgw041454@aol.com


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: /6 oversized valves
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2001 6:27 pm 
Quote:
: Hello all, I been searching through the
: "search" and looking at topics
: about oversized valves, The information is
: good but not direct to what I exactly need
: to tell my machinist.
:
: I was leaning toward the buick 3.8 valves. If I
: were to choose the buick valves, what should
: be told to the machinist.The Buick valves
: are 1.71 and the lenth is 4.727 and the /6
: is 4.78 in lenth,which makes the buick
: valves .053 shorter.What needs to be done to
: correct, or would this "drop
: in".Also the exhaust valves are 1.487
: and 4.727 in lenth also, and the exh. on a
: slant six is 4.802, so were looking at .057
: difference on exhaust. Hes a very
: knowledgable guy (over 30 years) and
: understands exactly what im doing and has
: done it before, but im the kind of person
: that I need to make it clear to him, so
: theres no mix up.
:
: Using the chevy valves(1.72 1.50),wouldnt there
: be problems because of the lenth?
:
: Using the ford valves (what are the sizes?)is
: there a problem with the lenth?
:
: I would just like to put the least amount of
: machine work time into the valves, the
: easiest one that works for a oversized
: valved head. I dont want to get creative,
: just get something that works. Thank You


In general, you can use the Buick valve if you are running a low lift cam, use the Ford valves if you are using a higher lift cam.
The Chebby units are cheap to buy but take a lot of work to fit into the head and get good rocker arm geometry.
DD


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: /6 oversized valves
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2001 7:53 pm 
Quote:
: In general, you can use the Buick valve if you
: are running a low lift cam, use the Ford
: valves if you are using a higher lift cam.
: The Chebby units are cheap to buy but take a
: lot of work to fit into the head and get
: good rocker arm geometry.
: DD


I was leaning toward the .460 lift Mopar Performance cam, what lift would you think I should NOT go over for safe measures? Thanx

do0dlebug19@aol.com


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: /6 oversized valves
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2001 5:23 am 
Quote:
: I used Ford small block valves, Manley, from
: PAW, Part #'s S-1670 I(1.78) and A-1669
: E(1.453). These valves have 11/32"
: stems & are slightly longer than stock
: 6 valves. My machine shop cut the length of
: the new Ford valves (they have plenty of
: material above the lock groove) to match the
: original 6 valve length, and using Comp
: Cam's springs, retainers, and locks we were
: right on for spring height without shims and
: rocker arm contact pattern on the top of the
: stem. Also, the rockers do not come within
: 0.080" of the retainer at full lift
: (0.532" E). Rocker arm contact with the
: stem is directly related to valve length,
: and unlike a stud mount rocker, the only
: good way to change the contact point of the
: rocker to the valve stem is to adjust the
: valve length. We expect to rev this
: combination to 6000-6200 rpm with good
: reliability.


i also have a head that i plan on putting paw manley valves in. i ordered the same exhaust valve as above manley a1669 4.863 long and 1.453 head. intake basically the same as above but with a different length manley s1628 4.859 long and 1.780 head.
s1628 were $5.50 each and a1669 were $4.95 each. total with handling charge was just over $70.00. these are not stainless but mine are going in a van for towing and it will not be seeing alot of rpm. i would still think they are probably pretty safe up to 6000 rpm. hope this helps. these were listed in the paw catalog for a 289 ford engine.

buddy_37@hotmail.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2001 12:37 am 
Quote:
: The question I had about taking off stem length is that it seems you would lose the hardened tips at the end of the stem. It is not that deep. On the Ford valves, can you remove enough to also add a valve cap? or is accelerated wear not an issue?


dlaray@earthlink.net


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2001 2:30 pm 
My machine shop, which does a lot of high doller super mod motors, was not concerned about the amount of material we removed from the valve stem tips. They said it would only be a problem if the stems had hardened stem ends added to the base stem metal. The Manley valves did not, and the tips appear to be just as hard as before the cut was made. Engine not yet running, so we won't know for a little while.

sgw041454@aol.com


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited