Slant Six Forum https://www.slantsix.org/forum/ |
|
Is this a waste of $$? MP valves. https://www.slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3538 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | CrAlt [ Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Is this a waste of $$? MP valves. |
I have a basic built up slant, 60+ off the head 4bbl/headers, ISKY cam. Now i went out and got a set of MP "oversized" /6 valves. And I was bumbed out when i held them up to a stock one. I didnt do my research... These are 1.7" intake (stock is 1.62) and 1.44 exst (stock 1.36). Is such a small diffreance in valves even going to be noticable? I already powered this head...was just going to pull it again to put these in. cralt@broke.for.now |
Author: | Dave M [ Tue Apr 30, 2002 11:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Is this a waste of $$? MP valves. |
Quote:
: I have a basic built up slant, 60+ off the head : 4bbl/headers, ISKY cam. : : Now i went out and got a set of MP : "oversized" /6 valves. And I was : bumbed out when i held them up to a stock : one. I didnt do my research... : These are 1.7" intake (stock is 1.62) and : 1.44 exst (stock 1.36). Is such a small : diffreance in valves even going to be : noticable? I already powered this head...was : just going to pull it again to put these in. Ten years ago I removed my head and installed the same valves. I did some small port work and set the head back on the engine. It ran about .250 faster. So I guess it was worth the money. I still used that same valve on last years race engine which ran a 12.120 @ 108 MPH. The only reason I am removing them is because I need more installed height for the new cam. damuel@kalama.com |
Author: | Doctor Dodge (Doug Dutra) [ Wed May 01, 2002 12:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Is this a waste of $$? MP valves. |
Quote:
: I have a basic built up slant, 60+ off the head : 4bbl/headers, ISKY cam. : : Now i went out and got a set of MP : "oversized" /6 valves. And I was : bumbed out when i held them up to a stock : one. I didnt do my research... : These are 1.7" intake (stock is 1.62) and : 1.44 exst (stock 1.36). Is such a small : diffreance in valves even going to be : noticable? I already powered this head...was : just going to pull it again to put these in. A 225 needs all the head flow help it can get, these valves and a pocket port job will make a difference. DD |
Author: | mark dingbaum [ Wed May 01, 2002 10:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Hey Dave, info for you |
Hi Dave, I've got one of the MP ported heads that they made a while ago. I suspect it uses the same valves. While searching for more installed height for a new cam, I used Hughes Engines offset retainers to install their double spring at about 1.80 (have not measured it yet) on these valves. I am using Mark Goodman's roller rockers and have enough room above the retainer. If you (or anyone else) want details (part numbers) let me know. regards, mark mldingba@rockwellcollins.com |
Author: | Will [ Wed May 01, 2002 6:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Is this a waste of $$? MP valves. |
The "fast" race cars dont use valves much bigger than that. Will Quote:
: I have a basic built up slant, 60+ off the head : 4bbl/headers, ISKY cam. : : Now i went out and got a set of MP : "oversized" /6 valves. And I was : bumbed out when i held them up to a stock : one. I didnt do my research... : These are 1.7" intake (stock is 1.62) and : 1.44 exst (stock 1.36). Is such a small : diffreance in valves even going to be : noticable? I already powered this head...was : just going to pull it again to put these in. slantsix@netzero.net |
Author: | Dave M [ Wed May 01, 2002 8:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Mark info for you :) |
Quote:
: Hi Dave, : : I've got one of the MP ported heads that they : made a while ago. I suspect it uses the same : valves. While searching for more installed : height for a new cam, I used Hughes Engines : offset retainers to install their double : spring at about 1.80 (have not measured it : yet) on these valves. I am using Mark : Goodman's roller rockers and have enough : room above the retainer. : : If you (or anyone else) want details (part : numbers) let me know. : : regards, : mark Regards Mark ?? Not sure about that statement ? I also have a set of Mark Goodman's rocker arms. They have been used now for four seasons and still look like brand new. For the new engine I will using a set of Comp. Cams retainer that have .050" more installed height. Now I can't wait to try this new engine out. : ![]() damuel@kalama.com |
Author: | rj [ Thu May 02, 2002 11:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Mark info for you :) |
Where do you get the Goodman rockers? RJ rj@flyingcamel.net |
Author: | Dave M [ Sat May 04, 2002 8:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Rocker Arms |
Quote:
: Where do you get the Goodman rockers? : RJ I bought mine from Mark about 4 years ago? I think ?? I payed around $450 ?? Lots of info huh? damuel@kalama.com |
Author: | bud L. [ Sat May 25, 2002 6:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Is this a waste of $$? MP valves. |
I just went to my local Mopar dealership, looking for the oversize valves. He said they were 'NS1', which means no longer available. So, are they available somewhere else? Quote:
: : I have a basic built up slant, 60+ off the head : 4bbl/headers, ISKY cam. : : Now i went out and got a set of MP : "oversized" /6 valves. And I was : bumbed out when i held them up to a stock : one. I didnt do my research... : These are 1.7" intake (stock is 1.62) and : 1.44 exst (stock 1.36). Is such a small : diffreance in valves even going to be : noticable? I already powered this head...was : just going to pull it again to put these in. fglmopar@aol.com |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |