Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2025 12:21 pm

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:04 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:29 am
Posts: 1290
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland U.S.A.
Car Model:
seems like some myth about mpg up to 36 mpg ? ? ?
i'm finding, any 1st had drivers have real mpg info..

$5 gas :evil: can't be far...

_________________
Image
slant six's RULE!
http://www.usajon.com


Top
   
 Post subject: Uhhh...
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:58 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:27 pm
Posts: 9714
Location: Salem, OR
Car Model:
My dad got 30-32 mpg highway driving flat I-5 55 miles each way from Portland to Salem 6 days a week, when his was brand new.

With a tired hi-miler motor and a somewhat rusty hulk when I bought what is now the Hyperpak duster, I got 28 mpg 90% highway driving.

This all assumes that everything works and is in tune, the car has the A-833OD option, and you can live with acceleration that is slower than a Prius on Battery only mode.

-D.Idiot


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 4:55 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:29 am
Posts: 1290
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland U.S.A.
Car Model:
OK
it has been 1 month since this post

seems that no one owns one or knows anyone who does / who reads this forum regualry

then the slant six is not considered a economy car.

_________________
Image
slant six's RULE!
http://www.usajon.com


Top
   
 Post subject: Yep...
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 5:24 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:27 pm
Posts: 9714
Location: Salem, OR
Car Model:
Quote:
then the slant six is not considered a economy car.
Not if you are comparing it to the 42.7 mpg Honda Hybrid, or the 51 mpg 1986 Honda 5 spd manual Civic, or other beer cans like the Aveo/etc...

You can get more out of your slant six, but aerodynamics, weight, and engineering the system with max spark advance and max EGR is going a bit far afield.

-D.Idiot


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 7:19 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor

Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:13 am
Posts: 444
Location: Jensen Beach, FL
Car Model:
hi sl6 sages- wow discussions here about feather dusters and dart lites are getting few and far between. have had my 76 feather since 89. it has the od , 225 and the 2.9 axle. this would give an amazing high final drive ratio of 2.15. DI has the correct figures. mine got 31 consistently on the highway and 23 in town. my current 92 volvo 240 wagon with 5spd od and 4 cyl. gets 25/32 mpg, almost the same as the feather. would have to consider the feather a genuine economy car even by recent standards. the feather was epa rated at 36 highway. never saw one that actually got that number but truth is that very few of the cars from that era actually got the stated epa mileage. you old fuds from then will remember the disclaimer in those ads, "your actual mileage may vary." luckily today car manufacturers do not lie. paladin


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2012 8:37 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:29 am
Posts: 1290
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland U.S.A.
Car Model:
Quote:
hi sl6 sages- wow discussions here about feather dusters and dart lites are getting few and far between. have had my 76 feather since 89. it has the od , 225 and the 2.9 axle. this would give an amazing high final drive ratio of 2.15. DI has the correct figures. mine got 31 consistently on the highway and 23 in town. my current 92 volvo 240 wagon with 5spd od and 4 cyl. gets 25/32 mpg, almost the same as the feather. would have to consider the feather a genuine economy car even by recent standards. the feather was epa rated at 36 highway. never saw one that actually got that number but truth is that very few of the cars from that era actually got the stated epa mileage. you old fuds from then will remember the disclaimer in those ads, "your actual mileage may vary." luckily today car manufacturers do not lie. paladin
OK
31 mpg
take a look @ real time(April 2012) American cars average mpg

http://wot.motortrend.com/fuel-economy- ... 91529.html

_________________
Image
slant six's RULE!
http://www.usajon.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2012 10:43 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:27 pm
Posts: 9714
Location: Salem, OR
Car Model:
Quote:
take a look @ real time(April 2012) American cars average mpg
The article in the fine print shows that the study has 'weighted' results, looking closer they have averaged in SUV's into the mix...so yeah, it will
take about 5 Aveo's on highway mileage to get one Chevy Suburban out of the 16-18mpg rut at 65 mph...to make 24 mpg "average"...my wife's Jeep Grand Cherokee with the 4.0L will get about 18 mpg average (80% city), but in the 90% highway scenario it will get 20-21 mpg...

The feather duster is going to look real good if put next to say a Dodge Challenger with the Hemi strickly highway...but if I had to pass a truck on I-5 the Chally will get the job done, the Feather Duster will need about 5 miles to get up to 80 for the quick 'get around'.

The study doesn't even give the margin of error either, when compiling statistics they have a range of + or- a percent if this was 10% for this study based on actual driving conditions the sweet spot could be 21.6 mpg, or 26.5 mpg...

-D.Idiot

"42.7 percent of all statistics are made up"- Homer Simpson


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 5:17 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:50 pm
Posts: 2353
Location: Pertneer Nashville TN
Car Model:
My '93 Corolla with non ethanol 87 9lb gas got 38.7 last tank. Automatic. Why would I want to buy a hybrid?

_________________
'72 Duster 198 stock cam, 3:23's Hookers on jack stands for 8 years in the driveway
'79 Maxivan 360 Offy Qjet Comp RV cam/rusting in the driveway.
93 D350 160HP Cummins Auto :-( Dually Clubcab needs a injector pump
2005 Golden Couch Buick


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 9:17 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24799
Location: North America
Car Model:
Quote:
The study doesn't even give the margin of error either
None is called for in a study of this nature. This isn't a poll or anything like that; there is no margin of error. It's a simple weighted mean of averages: how many of each vehicle sold is known (plus or minus nothing), which makes it easy to sales-weight the figure to account for the relative presence of the various vehicles in the on-road fleet. Their rated fuel economy is known, and this study uses the city/highway average, which is now more accurate than ever with the recent changes to the rating system. At the scale being examined it doesn't matter if this particular owner drives that particular vehicle only on the highway or that particular owner drives this particular vehicle only in the city. The 24.1mpg number is cromulent.

(And, the Sivak-Schoettle team at UMTRI are very highly regarded as unbelievably hardnosed sticklers for precision, accuracy, and procedural rectitude).

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:17 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 1:57 pm
Posts: 2233
Location: Everett, WA
Car Model:
Quote:
then the slant six is not considered a economy car.
They were compared to a 440 powered Imperial...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 2:49 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:27 pm
Posts: 14766
Location: Park Forest, Illinoisy
Car Model: 68 Valiant
IIRC, when they came out A bodies were considered compact cars. They are now bigger than 2/3 of the cars on the road. :shock:

_________________
Official Cookie and Mater Tormentor.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 9:30 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:50 pm
Posts: 2353
Location: Pertneer Nashville TN
Car Model:
Quote:
IIRC, when they came out A bodies were considered compact cars. They are now bigger than 2/3 of the cars on the road. :shock:
Yet they are lighter.

_________________
'72 Duster 198 stock cam, 3:23's Hookers on jack stands for 8 years in the driveway
'79 Maxivan 360 Offy Qjet Comp RV cam/rusting in the driveway.
93 D350 160HP Cummins Auto :-( Dually Clubcab needs a injector pump
2005 Golden Couch Buick


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 8:28 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 1:57 pm
Posts: 2233
Location: Everett, WA
Car Model:
Federal regulations, what can you say...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:21 am 
Offline
3 Deuce Weber

Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 59
Car Model:
30-35 mpg on a good running /6 is accurate for sure but thats driving like a normal person, like anything the more you put you foot in it they will drink it up.

_________________
1970 dart swinger \six


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:16 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:33 pm
Posts: 1004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Car Model:
There aren't many people that have them. I would have bought one but CA forces us to smog 76 Dusters, so thats out the window.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited