Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Thu Nov 06, 2025 2:14 pm

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 4:15 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24774
Location: North America
Car Model:
Huh. This is interesting, iznit:
Attachment:
TSB_66DT-40s.jpg
TSB_66DT-40s.jpg [ 231.57 KiB | Viewed 4744 times ]

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 4:27 pm 
Offline
EFI Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:15 am
Posts: 418
Location: York NE
Car Model:
good to know.

_________________
Dave

1977 d-200 crew cab ex-army pickup wants it's /6 back
1962 Valiant 2 door, 170, three on the tree
1972 d-100 parts truck
80 volare wagon now a parts car


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 5:10 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & SL6 Racer

Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:57 pm
Posts: 9043
Location: Waynesboro, Pa.
Car Model: 65 Valiant 2Dr Post
Guess I might as well get my hammer out and break the little tab off now. It will save me time later breaking it off by accident! :D :D

_________________
2 Mopars come with Spark plug tubes. One is a world class, racing machine. The other is a 426 CI. boat anchor!
Image
12.70 @ 104.6
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 7:04 pm 
Offline
Supercharged

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:48 pm
Posts: 3842
Location: Indianapolis
Car Model:
Having spent some time in resolving design defects that show up as field failures.
Fixes like the one RH Kline bulletinized was really frowned upon in the organization that I worked in.
His plan may reduce the likely hood of a second manifold cracking, but does nothing to
prevent the crack on the initial manifold. The goal field service failure evaluation should be to prevent the first failure, not the second one.

I am thinking that if RH Kline's resolution was actually effective Chrysler Engine Engineering would have changed the part print
to have the notches in all slant six manifolds. I know that we were not allowed to change the part from the released print to resolve
a customer issue. If the part needed to be changed to resolve the issue, then the part print was changed, which put the change in all subsequent production.

Chrysler in the 60's was probably a different animal.

_________________
Doo Ron Ron and the Duke of Earl are friends of mine.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uX8Nj8ABEI8


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 7:21 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6

Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:29 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Houston
Car Model: 68 Valiant
Seems like that would negate the usefulness of the cone nut (or washer?) .


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 01, 2019 5:29 am 
Offline
EFI Slant 6

Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2019 7:57 am
Posts: 430
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Car Model: 1966 Dodge Dart
Quote:
Having spent some time in resolving design defects that show up as field failures.
Fixes like the one RH Kline bulletinized was really frowned upon in the organization that I worked in.
His plan may reduce the likely hood of a second manifold cracking, but does nothing to
prevent the crack on the initial manifold. The goal field service failure evaluation should be to prevent the first failure, not the second one.

I am thinking that if RH Kline's resolution was actually effective Chrysler Engine Engineering would have changed the part print
to have the notches in all slant six manifolds. I know that we were not allowed to change the part from the released print to resolve
a customer issue. If the part needed to be changed to resolve the issue, then the part print was changed, which put the change in all subsequent production.

Chrysler in the 60's was probably a different animal.
This does raise the question of why subsequent revisions of the manifold don't have this change. Perhaps they had simply change the diameter of the holes instead of slotting them completely, or added some other change to the manifold, and this was an interim fix?

_________________
Matt Cramer
1966 Dodge Dart turbo / EFI project


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:21 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:03 pm
Posts: 9956
Location: IRWIN PA
Car Model:
note how it came out as a truck depart. document.

Cars must have been less susceptible to this issue when the motor was in the first 10 years of service.


Greg

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/hyperpack
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 01, 2019 1:40 pm 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:20 pm
Posts: 13258
Location: Fircrest, WA
Car Model: 76 D100
Remember that Dodge was putting the slant six in industrial trucks up to the five ton rated models. Those sixes would have worked much harder than a Dart getting groceries. The benefit of the TSB would be preventative maintenance for owners still running an uncracked manifold. The notch could be ground or chipped out without removing the manifold (if one had the clearance and access) and notching the front and rear eyes is much easier than removing the whole manifold stack.

_________________
Casually looking for a Clifford hyperpak intake for cheap.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited