Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Tue Dec 30, 2025 6:20 pm

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: How big is too big?
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:08 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:33 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Rolla, MO
Car Model:
Ok, I just got a really good deal on a like new 600 CFM holley 4 barrel with vacuum secondaries (model 1850S, to be exact). I bought it with the intention of turning around and reselling it, but I started wondering. Is there any way that this wouldn't be too much carb for my six? I forsee a cam and some head work in my future, but I'm not sure if I'm gonna take the plunge to oversize valves or not.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: How big is too big?
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:14 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24805
Location: North America
Car Model:
Quote:
Ok, I just got a really good deal on a like new 600 CFM holley 4 barrel with vacuum secondaries (model 1850S, to be exact). I bought it with the intention of turning around and reselling it, but I started wondering. Is there any way that this wouldn't be too much carb for my six? I forsee a cam and some head work in my future, but I'm not sure if I'm gonna take the plunge to oversize valves or not.
That is a really, really, really, really big carburetor.

MAYBE if you were building a full-race motor it'd be appropriate. I sure wouldn't want to tune or feed it on the street.

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:21 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 11:08 am
Posts: 17299
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Car Model:
You can run it, but your time/$$ would be better spent on a smaller carb, espcially for a mild/medium motor. You would be MUCH happier with a 390 4bbl or Edel 500 4bbl or hly 500 2bbl, or...

Lou

_________________
Home of Slant6-powered fun machines since 1988


Top
   
 Post subject: What build/cam?
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:36 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:27 pm
Posts: 9714
Location: Salem, OR
Car Model:
That would be kinda ok, if you ran more cam than stock and had your car setup for higher performance. The Hpak Duster is currently running either a 1850 or an 80457 with stock valves, compcam 252, hpak intake...you have to use the black spring for the vacc.secondaries and jet down the primary side a little...all in all the car gets 2-3 mpg more with the 8007 Holley 390 though....


-D.Idiot


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:21 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:56 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Newfoundland Canada
Car Model:
I am running A 650 CFM. holly
on the street/strip. The gas
mileage is not good, but the power
is! :wink:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 8:01 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:27 pm
Posts: 14770
Location: Park Forest, Illinoisy
Car Model: 68 Valiant
I use a 390 Holley on mine. I am trying a 600 DP shortly, but my car is slightly modified. :shock:

_________________
Official Cookie and Mater Tormentor.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 5:31 am 
Offline
Guru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 11:22 am
Posts: 3740
Location: Sonoma, Calif.
Car Model: Many Darts and a Dacuda
The 600 is too much for a stock SL6 but I have used the Holley 1850 (600 cfm) vacuum secondary carb on a "built-up" Slant with good success.
DD


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:35 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 4:20 am
Posts: 2011
Location: Argentina
Car Model:
Hey DOc, must have been a really build up engine....

I remember reading a guy who used a 750 or 800 cfm on his rustang and got crappy driveability at low RPM, ugly torque and HP readings from the dyno, then and old mechanic told him to trash that big piece of junk (literally) and he installed a 500 cfm 2 barrel. His dyno readings went really up, especially in torque, and the low end was much more strong than before...

I think that most pepped up slants can hardly get any benefit when you pas over 500 cfm. Mine is @ 350 cfm and according to my calculations is already on the big side.

_________________
Juan Ignacio Caino

Please use e-mail button istead of PM'ing. I do log in sometimes but I'll be answering quicker thru e-mail.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 3:03 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:56 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Newfoundland Canada
Car Model:
Quote:
Hey DOc, must have been a really build up engine....

I remember reading a guy who used a 750 or 800 cfm on his rustang and got crappy driveability at low RPM, ugly torque and HP readings from the dyno, then and old mechanic told him to trash that big piece of junk (literally) and he installed a 500 cfm 2 barrel. His dyno readings went really up, especially in torque, and the low end was much more strong than before...

I think that most pepped up slants can hardly get any benefit when you pas over 500 cfm. Mine is @ 350 cfm and according to my calculations is already on the big side.
argentina-slantsixer I can't get any benefit under 600 CFM's
I got the 650 CFM on the car now and the car runs 14.2 in
the 1/4 , very good street driveable, and on the dyon I got
200 hP with 230 torq so I would say bigger is always better.


Top
   
 Post subject: Spreadbore???????
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 3:42 pm 
Offline
Supercharged

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:50 pm
Posts: 6291
Location: So California
Car Model: 64 Plymouth Valiant
Anybody ever try a spreadbore????????

I'd think with the small primaries, the low end & light throttle should still be good, then you have those huge secondaries when you open it up..... :lol:

_________________
Ed
64 Valiant 225 / 904 / 42:1 manual steering / 9" drum brakes

8)


Top
   
 Post subject: Spreadbore carb
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 4:59 am 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:12 am
Posts: 107
Car Model:
I think Frank Raso has been using a Quadrajet. That has very small primaries, translating to good velocity and driveability. The secondaries are huge, and are usually rated at 850cfm :shock:
The Pontiac OHC 6 from '66-'67 had a hipo version that used a Q-jet.

_________________
Last one out , turn off the light


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:52 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 4:20 am
Posts: 2011
Location: Argentina
Car Model:
I don't know.... I feel approaching to bigger performance thru bigger carburetion would be as dumb as getting a bigger gas pedal :lol:

Of course, if everything's accordingly set up, you can go all the CFM you want.

When I say that 600 CFM is overkill for a slant I mean a stocker or mildly pepped mill.

I suppose that rear axle ratio has to do with this since the taller the ratio is, the sooner it revs up, demanding more CFM's... is something like radical advance curves....

_________________
Juan Ignacio Caino

Please use e-mail button istead of PM'ing. I do log in sometimes but I'll be answering quicker thru e-mail.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:36 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 11:33 am
Posts: 2378
Location: Central GA
Car Model: Many & varied, including stock & hopped up /6's
Quote:
I don't know.... I feel approaching to bigger performance thru bigger carburetion would be as dumb as getting a bigger gas pedal :lol:
Right as rain. :)

D/W

_________________
Image
If it ain't broke, fix it!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:47 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:27 pm
Posts: 14770
Location: Park Forest, Illinoisy
Car Model: 68 Valiant
If his car actually runs low 14's a 600 probably isn't hurting anything. I tried a 600 on mine when it was running 14:20's. It was not quite as fast as with a 390, but it was tons more consistent. :shock:

_________________
Official Cookie and Mater Tormentor.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 10:13 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 11:33 am
Posts: 2378
Location: Central GA
Car Model: Many & varied, including stock & hopped up /6's
...you'd probably all have run better if you had tossed that holley trash and run an AFB! :roll: :twisted: :lol:

D/W

_________________
Image
If it ain't broke, fix it!


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited